Home
‘David Heinemeier Hansson misquotes George Gilder’
Fork
Forking
‘David Heinemeier Hansson misquotes George Gilder’
by Dennis Hackethal
Original
Text
TO THE MIND THAT doubts that decisive role of genius, courage, and chance in the past, the future usually seems impossible; the Western world appears doomed to decay and coercion as its growing populations press against a closing frontier, and science and technology meet the law of diminishing returns. A sociology of despair is emerging, based on spurious science, incomprehension of the hardships of all human history, and blindness to the perennial sources of human triumph. While physicists begin to concede freedom for microscopic particles, social scientists still begrudge it to human beings. Atomic structure is allowed room for the random and incalculable; but social structure is supposedly under siege by mechanistic forces of entropy and exhaustion, playing out their logic in a “closing circle” of ecological decline. These attitudes lead to systematic distortions of vision and policy. The mindset that prompts a man to see the future blighted by coercion and scarcity also inclines him to believe that the present can be made as free of risk and uncertainty as the past, receding unchangeably in the lenses of hindsight.
Accurately reproduce the original text. Don’t change it – copy/pasting works best. Retain inline formatting by using
markdown syntax
.
Source
Where is the original text from? Provide a link or, when quoting from a book, provide at least the author and title. The more information the better.
Preview of original
Quote
Text
TO THE MIND THAT doubts that decisive role of genius, courage, and chance in the past, the future usually seems impossible; the Western world appears doomed to decay and coercion as its growing populations press against a closing frontier, and science and technology meet the law of diminishing returns. sociology of despair is emerging, based on spurious science, incomprehension of the hardships of all human history, and blindness to the perennial sources of human triumph. While physicists begin to concede freedom for microscopic particles, social scientists still begrudge it to human beings. Atomic structure is allowed room for the random and incalculable; but social structure is supposedly under siege by mechanistic forces of en tropy and exhaustion, playing out their logic in a "closing circle" of ecological decline. These attitudes lead to systematic distortions of vision and policy. The mindset that prompts man to see the future blighted by coercion and scarcity also inclines him to believe that the present can be made as free of risk and uncertainty as the past, receding unchangeably in the lenses of hindsight.
Quote the original. Do not use any surrounding quotation marks. If you are reusing a pre-existing quote, don’t change it; follow the guidelines given for the original text.
Source (optional)
If you are reusing a pre-existing quote, provide a source. Again, the more information the better.
Preview of quote
Ellipsis
Used for omissions. The default is ‘[...]’, but ‘. . .’ and variations thereof are also commonly used. If you are reusing a pre-existing quote, reflect its use of ellipsis.
Advanced
You can adjust additional settings below. Odds are you don’t need to.
Pattern
/
/m
A Ruby regular expression determining what is considered a diffable chunk. Defaults to
.
for individual characters. Use
\w+
to compare whole words instead.
Diffing algorithm
Myers (default)
Minimal
Patience
Histogram
Pick the algorithm that generates the most semantic diff for your purposes. Myers often works best. Different algorithms sometimes produce the same results.
Create permalink
Title
Give a descriptive title.
Your real name (optional)
Provide your name if you want.
Notes (optional)
Anything you want to add such as credits, context, instructions for how to read the diff, etc.
Preview of notes
Save publicly
Please note