Guzey properly (mostly) quotes Peter Meerlo et al

Nov 01, 2024 · By Dennis Hackethal · Forked from Guzey misquotes Hemmeter et al re established antidepressant therapy · Fork · Check another quote

Original text

Thus, considering its safety, this technique can now be considered among the first-line antidepressant treatment strategies for patients affected by mood disorders.
Peter Meerlo et al (eds.). Sleep, Neuronal Plasticity and Brain Function. Belgium: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Sleep_Neuronal_Plasticity_and_Brain_Func/o2Z1CQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22thus,%20considering%22

Quote text

[C]onsidering its safety, this technique [sleep deprivation] can now be considered among the first-line antidepressant treatment strategies for patients affected by mood disorders. …
Peter Meerlo et al (eds.) (ibid), as quoted in: Guzey, A. Matthew Walker’s “Why We Sleep” Is Riddled with Scientific and Factual Errors. Guzey.com. 2019 November. Available from https://guzey.com/books/why-we-sleep/. Bold emphasis removed
Ellipsis used (if any): ‘…’
✓ No issues found using regular expression . and Myers algorithm. 
Thus,‧c[C]onsidering‧its‧safety,‧this‧technique‧[sleep‧deprivation]‧can‧now‧be‧considered‧among‧the‧first-line‧antidepressant‧treatment‧strategies‧for‧patients‧affected‧by‧mood‧disorders.‧…

Explanation

# Part Valid? Explanation
1 
Thus,‧c
 ✓ yes Deletion is followed by a valid insertion.
2 
[C]
 ✓ yes Insertion is properly bracketed.
3 
onsidering‧its‧safety,‧this‧technique‧
4 
[sleep‧deprivation]‧
 ✓ yes Insertion is properly bracketed.
5 
can‧now‧be‧considered‧among‧the‧first-line‧antidepressant‧treatment‧strategies‧for‧patients‧affected‧by‧mood‧disorders.
6 
‧
 ✓ yes
7 
…
 ✓ yes Insertion is an ellipsis.

Notes

Looks fine overall. The ellipsis, however, spans 14 (!) pages, combining this quote with another. The quotes should just be broken up.

Embed

Click this button to copy the embed code, then paste it where you want the diff to appear:

Please note
  • This tool is in its beta stage. Expect things to break; proceed with caution.
  • This tool isn't magic. It can only catch errors that can be determined programmatically. But quoting properly is also about accurately reflecting the meaning of the quoted content to the reader. That requires an understanding of the content, which is something this site cannot give you. Quoting properly is still your responsibility.
  • Red markings indicate that something was removed in the quote that was present in the original. Conversely, green markings indicate that something added in the quote that wasn't present in the original. Red and green markings don't necessarily error – improper additions and deletions are underlined in wavy red.
  • When no issues are found, that is NOT a guarantee that a quote is not a misquote.
  • Results are not necessarily in line with your styleguide. For example, for ellipses at the end of a sentence, preceding punctuation may or may not be omitted depending on your style guide. Given the following original...
    Tim had dinner, and he enjoyed it.
    ...the quote below will be marked as incorrect because it omits the comma:
    Tim had dinner [...].
    This quote, however, will pass with zero issues:
    Tim had dinner, [...].
    Whether punctuation can be omitted without breaking the meaning the author of the quoted text intended also depends on context and content, so you need to check yourself.
  • Depending on your styleguide, ‘swallowing’ a linebreak with an ellipsis may not be permissible, but this site does permit it.
  • Formatting, such as italics and bold text, is not yet supported. Consequently, changes in formatting cannot be detected. Use something like markdown syntax – *single asterisks for italics*, **double asterisks for bold text**, etc. – to indicate and detect changes in formatting. Pasting from other websites should convert to this syntax automatically. If your quote adds or omits emphasis, be sure to indicate that in your text (eg by saying 'emphasis added' or 'emphasis removed').