I also had referee problems. The referee of the paper in which I presented that proof insisted that Turing’s phrase “would naturally be regarded as computable” referred to mathematical naturalness – mathematical intuition – not nature. And so what I had proved wasn’t Turing’s conjecture.
I also had referee problems. The referee of the paper in which I presented that proof insisted that Turing’s phrase “would naturally be regarded as computable” referred to mathematical naturalness – mathematical intuition – not nature. And so what I had proved wasn’t Turing’s conjecture.
.
and Myers algorithm, underlined in wavy red.
I‧also‧ had‧ referee‧ problems.‧ The‧ referee‧ of‧ the‧ paper‧ in‧ which‧ I‧ presented‧ that‧ proof‧ insisted‧ that‧ Turing’s‧ phrase‧ “would‧ *naturally*‧be‧ regarded‧ as‧ computable”‧ referred‧ to‧ mathematical‧ naturalness‧ –‧ mathematical‧ intuition‧ –‧ not‧ *nature.*‧And‧ so‧ what‧ I‧ had‧ proved‧ wasn’t‧ Turing’s‧ conjecture.
# | Part | Valid? | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
I‧ |
||
2 |
|
× no | Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement]. |
3 |
naturally |
||
4 |
|
× no | Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement]. |
5 |
‧ |
||
6 |
|
× no | Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement]. |
7 |
nature. |
||
8 |
|
× no | Deletions must be indicated, eg by ‘[...]’ or [replacement]. |
9 |
‧ |
Ironically, Temple creates this misquote in the context of his allegation that Deutsch had misquoted Turing in a paper published by the Royal Society.
Click this button to copy the embed code, then paste it where you want the diff to appear: